# Why did Turnitin Clarity 2026 flag 13% AI on my human-written WGU MBA C2013 paper and how to fix it (#268)?

- **Canonical URL**: http://www.employeevantage.com/q/q-8802-search-intent-0268
- **Portal**: AskCampusQA (CampusQA)
- **Topic Cluster**: APA 7th & Rubric Grading
- **Asked by**: GradStudent_268 (BSN/MSN & MBA Cohort Member)
- **Question Upvotes**: 84
- **Tags**: #turnitin, #wgu, #mba, #apa7, #ai-detection, #appeals

## Question Details
I drafted my 12-page WGU MBA C2013 task from scratch using my own outline, yet the 2026 Turnitin AI detector highlighted my introduction and methodology transitions at 13%. What sentence-level edits eliminate false-positive perplexity triggers before final evaluation?

## Accepted Expert Answer — Sarah Jenkins, MSN, RN (Cohort #89) (Capella FlexPath NURS-FPX 4010–4900 Grader)
- **Credentials**: Certified Nurse Educator · Distinguished Rubric Evaluator · 11 Years Grading
- **Upvotes**: 103

> **Key Expert Verdict**: Eliminate symmetrical 18-word sentences and boilerplate signposts ('Moreover', 'Crucially'); vary sentence length (8 to 32 words) and embed empirical numbers in every claim.

2026 Turnitin Clarity Audit: False positives around 13% occur when academic prose has low burstiness (uniform sentence length) and predictable transition openers. Break every third sentence into a short 9-word analytical punch, remove stock words like delve, underscore, multifaceted , and tie your WGU C2013 rubric points directly to numerical dataset outputs (n = 264).

## Additional Peer & Specialist Answers (3)

### 1. Sarah Jenkins, MSN, RN (Cohort #129) — Capella FlexPath NURS-FPX 4010–4900 Grader (+44)
Passed WGU C2013 in 28 hours after matching each task prompt number (A1, A2, B1) directly in my subheadings.

### 2. Chloe Stewart, MA (Cohort #158) — UK Russell Group & OSCOLA Dissertation Editor (+35)
Also keep your Google Docs or Word version history enabled — it is the ultimate timestamped proof of human authorship.

### 3. Olivia Bennett, JD (Cohort #69) — Academic Integrity & False-Positive Appeals Advisor (+26)
Varying my sentence rhythm and citing raw regression p-values cleared the highlighted blocks to 0% AI in 20 minutes.
